POLICY, PRACTICE & PUBLISHING LAW REPORTS, 3PLR
FIND JUDGMENTS BY:
PRE-1914 – 1914 JUDGMENTS OF COURTS CONNECTED WITH NIGERIA
TITLE | COURT | CITATIONS |
1914 | ||
IBRAHIM V. THE KING | SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG | No. 112 of 1913 3PLR/1914/1 (SC-HK) |
PLAYER V. CROMPTON & CO. LIMITED. | CHANCERY DIVISION | [1914] 954 1 Ch. 3PLR/1914/2 (CH.D-E) |
IN RE H. E. THORNE AND SON LIMITED. | CHANCERY DIVISION | [1914] 438 2 Ch. 3PLR/1914/3 (CH.D-E) |
WINTERBOTTOM V. ALLWOOD. | KING’S BENCH DIVISION | [1914] KBD 608 3PLR/1914/4 (KB.D-E) |
1913 | ||
AKPAN AWO V. COOKEY GAM | SUPREME COURT OF LAGOS COLONY | 3PLR/1913/1 (SC-L) |
ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA V. ADELAIDE STEAMSHIP COMPANY, LIMITED | PRIVY COUNCIL | 3PLR/1913/2 (PC-E) |
IN RE NATIONAL TELEPHONE COMPANY | CHANCERY DIVISION | 3PLR/1913/3 (CH.D-E) |
KING V. BROWN DURANT AND CO | CHANCERY DIVISION | [1913] 2 Ch. 416 3PLR/1913/4 (CH.D-E) |
1912 | ||
LLOYD (PAUPER) V. GRACE, SMITH AND CO. | HOUSE OF LORDS | [1912] 716 1 A.C. 3PLR/1912/1 (H.L-E) |
IN RE A SOLICITOR. EX PARTE THE LAW SOCIETY. | DIVISIONAL COURT | [1912] 1 K.B. 30 3PLR/1912/2 (DC-E) |
1911 | ||
ATTORNEY-GENERAL V. EXETER CORPORATION | KING’S BENCH DIVISION | [1911] 1092 1 K.B. 3PLR/1911/3 (KB.D-E) |
KOFFYFONTEIN MINES, LTD. V. MOSELY | HOUSE OF LORDS | [1911] A.C. 409 3PLR/1911/4 (HL-E) |
LURCOTT V. WAKELY & WHEELER. | COURT OF APPEAL | [1911] 1 K.B.905 3PLR/1911/5 (CA-E) |
1910 | ||
BRAILEY V. RHODESIA CONSOLIDATED LIMITED. | CHANCERY DIVISION | [1909 B. 3095.] 3PLR/1910/1 (CH.D-E) |
MOSELY V. KOFFYFONTEIN MINES, LTD. | COURT OF APPEAL | [1911] 1 Ch. 73 1910 WL 15576 (CA-E), 3PLR/1910/2 (CA-E) |
1909 | ||
LEWIS V. BANKOLE | SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA | 3PLR/1909/1 (SC-N) |
YONGE V. TOYNBEE | COURT OF APPEAL | 3PLR/1909/2 (CA-E) |
1908 | ||
RE NATIONAL MOTOR MAIL-COACH COMPANY, LIMITED.CLINTON’S CLAIM. | COURT OF APPEAL | [1908] 2 Ch. 515 3PLR/1908/1 (CA-E) |
SS. KNUTSFORD, LIMITED V. TILLMANNS AND CO. | HOUSE OF LORDS | [1908] A.C. 406 3PLR/1908/2 (HL.E) |
1907 | ||
IN RE A SOLICITOR. EX PARTE HALES | DIVISIONAL COURT | [1907] 2 K.B.539 3PLR/1907/1 (DC-E) |
IN RE GARRARD. GORDON V. CRAIGIE. | CHANCERY DIVISION | [1907] 1 Ch. 382 3PLR/1907/2 (CH.D-E) |
CHARLIE KING AMACHREE V. DANIEL KALLIO AND OTHERS. | SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA | (1908) 2 N.LR.108 3PLR/1907/3 (SC-N) |
1906 | ||
BULLOCK V. THE LONDON GENERAL OMNIBUS COMPANY AND OTHERS. | IN THE COURT OF APPEAL. | [1907] 1 K.B. 264 3PLR/1906/1 (CA-E) |
BRITISH EQUITABLE ASSURANCE COMPANY, LIMITED V. BAILLY | HOUSE OF LORDS | (1906) A.C. 35 3PLR/1906/2 (HL-E) |
1904 | ||
BAILY V. BRITISH EQUITABLE ASSURANCE COMPANY. | COURT OF APPEAL | [1904] 1 Ch. 374 3PLR/1904/1 (CA) |
E. M. BOWDEN’S PATENTS SYNDICATE LIMITED V. HERBERT SMITH AND CO | CHANCERY DIVISION | [1904]2 Ch. 86 3PLR/1904/2 (CH.D-E) |
JOHNSON DEFENDANT V. THE KING PLAINTIFF | PRIVY COUNCIL | 3PLR/1904/3 (PC-E) |
LOGAN V. BANK OF SCOTLAND AND OTHERS | COURT OF APPEAL | [1904] 495 2 K.B. 3PLR/1904/4 (CA-E) |
MOSELY V. KOFFYFONTEIN MINES, LTD. | COURT OF APPEAL CHANCERY DIVISION | [1904] 2 Ch. 108 3PLR/1904/5 (CH.D-E) |
1903 | ||
BOZSON V. ALTRINCHAM URBAN DISTRICT COUNCIL | COURT OF APPEAL | [1903] 1 K.B. 547 3PLR/1903/1 (CA-E) |
1902 | ||
JACOBS V. MORRIS. | COURT OF APPEAL | (1902) 1 Ch 816. 3PLR/1902/1 (CA-E) |
BULLIVANT AND OTHERS V. THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR VICTORIA (ON BEHALF OF HER MAJESTY) | HOUSE OF LORDS | [1901] A.C. 196 3PLR/1902/2 (HL-E) |
THE GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY V. THE LONDON AND COUNTY BANKING COMPANY, LIMITED | HOUSE OF LORDS | [1901] 1 A.C. 414 3PLR/1902/3 (HL-E) |
WHITE V. EDMOND. | CHANCERY DIVISION | [1901] 1 Ch.570 3PLR/1902/4 (CH-D) |
1900 | ||
ALLEN V. GOLD REEFS OF WEST AFRICA LTD | COURT OF APPEAL | 3PLR/1900/1 (CA-E) |
GLUCKSTEIN V.BARNES (OFFICIAL RECEIVER AND OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF OLYMPIA, LIMITED) | HOUSE OF LORDS | [1900] A.C. 240 3PLR/1900/2 (HL-E) |
1899 | ||
LAGUNAS NITRATE COMPANY V. LAGUNAS SYNDICATE | COURT OF APPEAL | [1899] 2 Ch. 392 3PLR/1899/1 (CA-E) |
1897 | ||
MOUNTIFIELD V. WARD. | DIVISIONAL COURT | [1897] 1 Q.B. 326 3PLR/1897/1 (DC-E) |
THOMAS ABERCROMBY WELTON V. JOSEPH JOHN SAFFERY | HOUSE OF LORDS. | [1897] A.C. 299 3PLR/1897/2 (HL-E) |
GOLD REEFS OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA LIMITED V. DAWSON | CHANCERY DIVISION | [1897] 1 Ch. 115 3PLR/1897/3 (CH.D-E) |
1896 | ||
ANDREWS V. GAS METER COMPANY | COURT OF APPEAL | [1896 A. 525.] 3PLR/1896/1 (CA-E) |
ANDREWS V. MOCKFORD | COURT OF APPEAL | [1896] 1 Q.B. 372 3PLR/1896/2 (CA-E) |
HUNT V. WORSFOLD | CHANCERY DIVISION | [1896 H. 417.] 3PLR/1896/3 (CH.D-E) |
1894 | ||
ALLINSON V. GENERAL COUNCIL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND REGISTRATION. | COURT OF APPEAL | [1894] 1 Q.B. 750 3PLR/1894/1 (CA-E) |
IN RE A SOLICITOR EX PARTE THE INCORPORATED LAW SOCIETY. | QUEENS BENCH DIVISION | [1894] QBD 254 3PLR/1894/2 QB.D-E) |
JOHN MAKIN AND SARAH MAKIN, HIS WIFE V. THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR NEW SOUTH WALES | PRIVY COUNCIL | [1894] A.C. 57 3PLR/1894/3 (PC-E) |
1893 | ||
FIRTH AND SONS V. DE LAS RIVAS AND ANOTHER | DIVISIONAL COURT | [1893] 1 Q.B. 768 3PLR/1893/1 (DC-E) |
IN RE WEARE, A SOLICITOR. IN RE THE SOLICITORS ACT, 1888. | COURT OF APPEAL | 1893 2QB 290 3PLR/1893/2 (CA) |
1892 | ||
LANE FOX V. KENSINGTON AND KNIGHTSBRIDGE ELECTRIC LIGHTING COMPANY. | COURT OF APPEAL | [1892] 3 Ch.424 3PLR/1892/1 (CA-E) |
1891 | ||
WILLIAM LEWIS THE ELDER V. THE COLONIAL SECRETARY | SUPREME COURT OF LAGOS COLONY | 3PLR/1891/1 (SC-LN) |
1889 | ||
BIRCH V. CROPPER AND OTHERS IN RE THE BRIDGEWATER NAVIGATION COMPANY LIMITED | HOUSE OF LORDS | (1889) LR 14 App. Cas. 525 3PLR/1889/1 (HL-E) |
WILDE V. SIR HENRY WILLIAM PEEK, BARONET | HOUSE OF LORDS | 14 App. Cas. 337 1889 July 1. 3PLR/1889/2 (HL-E) |
GRAY V. SMITH. | COURT OF APPEAL | (1889) 43 Ch.D. 208 3PLR/1889/2 (HL-E) |
WOOD V. ODESSA WATERWORKS COMPANY. | CHANCERY DIVISION | (1889) 42 ChD 636 3PLR/1889/3 (HL-E) |
LOVELL AND CHRISTMAS V. GILBERT WALTER BEAUCHAMP | HOUSE OF LORDS | [1894] A.C. 607 3PLR/1889/4 (HL-E) |
1888 | ||
BANK OF AFRICA, LIMITED V. THE COLONIAL GOVERNMENT | PRIVY COUNCIL | 3PLR/1888/1 (PC-E) |
BOYLE V. SACKER. | COURT OF APPEAL | 3PLR/1888/2 (PC-E) |
IN THE GOODS OF MOORE. | PROBATE DIVORCE AND ADMIRALTY DIVISION | 13 P.D. 36 3PLR/1888/3 (PC-E) |
1887 | ||
IN RE ADAM EYTON, LIMITED. EX PARTE CHARLESWORTH. | COURT OF APPEAL | 3PLR/1887/1 (CA-E) |
IN RE JOHNSON. | IN THE COURT OF APPEAL | 20 Q.B.D. 68 3PLR/1887/2 |
YARMOUTH V. FRANCE. | DIVISIONAL COURT | 19 Q.B.D. 647 3PLR/1887/3 (DC) |
1886 | ||
GUSTAV ADOLPH ABRATH V. THE NORTH EASTERN RAILWAY COMPANY | HOUSE OF LORDS | 11 App. Cas. 247 3PLR/1886/1 (HL-E) |
IN RE HARRISON. LATIMER HARRISON | CHANCERY DIVISION | (1886) L.R. 32 Ch.D. 395 3PLR/1886/2 (HL-E) |
JOHNSTONE V. MILLING | COURT OF APPEAL | 16 Q.B.D. 460 3PLR/1886 (HL-E) |
1884 | ||
GIBBINGS V. STRONG | COURT OF APPEAL | [1882 G. 1135.] 3PLR/1884/1 (CA-E) |
1883 | ||
ABRATH V. THE NORTH EASTERN RAILWAY COMPANY. | COURT OF APPEAL | 11 Q.B.D. 440 3PLR/1883/1 (CA-E) |
BRADBURY V. COOPER | DIVISIONAL COURT | 3PLR/1883/2 (DC-E) |
FORSDIKE V. COLQUHOUN. | DIVISIONAL COURT | 11 Q.B.D. 71 3PLR/1883/3 (DC-E) |
MADDISON V. ALDERSON | HOUSE OF LORDS | 8 App. Cas. 467 3PLR/1883/4 (DC-E) |
MIDLAND RAILWAY COMPANY V. THE LOCAL BOARD FOR THE DISTRICT OF WITHINGTON. | COURT OF APPEAL | 3PLR/1883/5 (DC-E) |
1882 | ||
GUINNESS V. LAND CORPORATION OF IRELAND. | COURT OF APPEAL | 3PLR/1882/1 (CA-E) |
IMPERIAL HYDROPATHIC HOTEL COMPANY BLACKPOOL V. HAMPSON | COURT OF APPEAL | 3PLR/1882/2 (CA-E) |
VOISEY EX PARTE KNIGHT. | CHANCERY DIVISION | [1882] LR 2 3PLR/1882/3 (CA-E) |
WALSH V. LONSDALE. | COURT OF APPEAL | 3PLR/1882/4 (CA-E) |
1881 | ||
HENDRIKS V. MONTAGU. | COURT OF APPEAL | 17 Ch.D. 638 3PLR/1881/1 (CA-E) |
1878 | ||
ATTORNEY-GENERAL V. SWANSEA IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAMWAYS COMPANY | COURT OF APPEAL | 3PLR/1878/1 (CA-E) |
EMILE ERLANGER AND OTHERS V. THE NEW SOMBRERO PHOSPHATE COMPANY AND OTHERS | HOUSE OF LORDS | 3 App. Cas. 1218 3PLR/1878/2 (HL-E) |
IN RE HULL AND COUNTY BANK. | CHANCERY DIVISION | 3PLR/1878/3 (CH.D-E) |
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL V. LAMPLOUGH. | COURT OF APPEAL | (1878) 3 EX D 214 3PLR/1878/4 (CH.D-E) |
WHITEMAN V. HAWKINS. | DIVISIONAL COURT | 4 C.P.D.13 3PLR/1878/5 (DC-E) |
WILSON V. CHURCH. | COURT OF APPEAL | 11 Ch.D. 576 3PLR/1878/6 (CH.D-E) |
1877 | ||
GALE V. GALE. | CHANCERY DIVISION | 6 Ch.D. 144 3PLR/1877/1 (CH.D-E) |
HAND V. HALL. | COURT OF APPEAL | 1877 2 Ex.D. 355 3PLR/1877/2 (CA-E) |
1876 | ||
ANDREW LOWS V. EDWARD TELFORD AND ROBERT WESTRAY | HOUSE OF LORDS | 1 App. Cas. 414 3PLR/1876/1 (HL-E) |
ELEY V. THE POSITIVE GOVERNMENT SECURITY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY, LIMITED. | COURT OF APPEAL | 1 Ex.D. 88 3PLR/1876/2 (HL-E) |
1875 | ||
ASHBURY RAILWAY CARRIAGE AND IRON CO. V. RICHE. | DIVISIONAL COURT | 3PLR/1875/1 (DC-E) |
MACDOUGALL V. GARDINER. | COURT OF APPEAL | 3PLR/1875/2 (CA-E) |
1873 | ||
MURRAY, T.H MCCONNEL AND ANOTHER V. FRANK WHITTAKER BUSH | HOUSE OF LORDS | [L.R.] 37 6 H.L. 3PLR/1873/1 (HL-E) |
1871 | ||
GROSS, EX PARTE KINGSTON | COURT OF APPEAL | (1871) 6 CA. 632 3PLR/1871/1 (CA-E) |
1870 | ||
IN RE MERCANTILE TRADING COMPANY SCHRODER’S CASE | [L.R.] 131 11 EQ. 3PLR/1870/1 (EQ.-E) | |
1869 | ||
WEST V. DOBB. | QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION | 4 Q.B. 634 3PLR/1870/1 (QB.D-E) |
1868 | ||
HALL V. HALL. | COURTS OF PROBATE AND DIVORCE | 1 P. & D. 481 3PLR/1868/1 (CPD-E) |
1867 | ||
THE WESTERN BANK OF SCOTLAND WITH ITS LIQUIDATORS V. JAMES BAIRD AND THE TRUSTEES OF WILLIAM BAIRD, DECEASED | HOUSE OF LORDS | 48 Geo. 3, c. 151. 1 Sc. & Div. 170 3PLR/1867/1 (HL-E) |
1866 | ||
KELNER V. BAXTER AND OTHERS. | COURT OF COMMON PLEAS | 2 C.P. 174 3PLR/1866/1 (CCP-E) |
TWEDDLE V. ATKINSON | QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION | 3PLR/1866/2 (QBD-E) |
1865 | ||
GALLOWAY V. THE MAYOR, COMMONALTY AND CITIZENS OF LONDON | HOUSE OF LORDS | 3 De G J & S 59 46 E.R. 560 3PLR/1865/1 (HL-E) |
1862 | ||
PAUL FELTHOUSE V. BINDLEY | COURT OF COMMON PLEA | 142 ER 1032 3PLR/1862/1 (CCP-E) |
1843 | ||
FOSS V. HARBOTTLE | CHANCERY DIVISION | (1843) 2 Hare 461, 3PLR/1843/1 (CH.D-E) |
1816 | ||
BANKS V. GOODFELLOW | QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION | 5 Q.B. 549 3PLR/1816/1 (QBD-E) |
JUDGMENTS CONNECTED WITH NIGERIA – BY YEARS
JUDGMENTS BY AREAS OF PRACTICE
JUDGMENTS BY PRACTICE/PROCEDURE ISSUES